Memory instrumentation in OTP 21

May 02, 2018 · by John Högberg

The memory instrumentation module was rewritten for Erlang/OTP 21 to make it easier to use. In this post I’ll describe the rationale behind the new features and how to make use of them.

One of the most important features that a diagnostic tool can have is the ability to work on the fly. If it requires a restart then the condition you’re trying to diagnose might vanish, and you can’t use it to troubleshoot issues on “production” systems.

The previous implementation had a few major issues to this effect; you had to start the Erlang VM with a certain flag, accept considerable overhead, and worst of all suspend the VM while it collected all its data.

The amount of data it collected was also quite problematic; with one entry for every single allocation it was difficult to tell what was hiding in all that information, and since there was no way to tell whether a gap between two allocations was mapped or not it was needlessly difficult to use when trying to troubleshoot memory fragmentation.

The new implementation tackles these problems by scanning existing data structures to lower its overhead to the point it can be turned on by default, and tries to collect information in a manner that doesn’t harm the responsiveness of the system.

Carriers and memory fragmentation #

The VM allocates memory in large segments we call “carriers” and then allocates blocks within those. This has many benefits; since each carrier is completely separate from the others it’s easy to determine when they can be returned to the operating system, and they scale very well since we can guarantee that they’re only modified by per-thread instances which makes allocation and deallocation wait-free in most cases.

There are two types of carriers; single-block which always contain one large block, and multi-block that can contain several smaller blocks. While both of these rely on the operating system to minimize address space fragmentation, the latter kind can also become internally fragmented which will result in new carriers being created if no existing multi-block carrier can satisfy an allocation, even if the amount of unused memory exceeds the request.

While you can glean some information about average carrier utilization from erlang:system_info({allocator, Alloc}) and use pmap (or similar) to get an idea of how fragmented the address space is, it has always been a pain to get information about the individual carriers. Starting in OTP 21 you can ask the system for a list of all carriers without having to start the VM with any particular flags. The list contains information about each carrier’s total size, combined allocation size, allocation count, whether it’s in the migration pool, and a histogram over free block sizes.

We chose to represent the free blocks with histograms (log2, starting at 512 by default) as they make it easy to tell at a glance whether a carrier has fragmentation issues; if there’s a lot of free blocks clustered along the left side then it’s pretty safe to say there’s a problem.

In the example below, the ll_alloc carrier has no free blocks at all, the binary_alloc and eheap_alloc ones look healthy with a few very large blocks, and the fix_alloc carrier is somewhat fragmented with ~3KB free split into 22 blocks smaller than 512 bytes (although this is not a problem for this allocator type).

1> instrument:carriers().

(instrument:carriers/1 can be used to tweak the histograms and which allocators to look in.)

Allocations and memory utilization #

Those who have used erlang:memory() are probably familiar with how annoyingly general the system category can be. It’s possible to get a bit more information by using erlang:system_info({allocator, Alloc}) but the most it will do is tell you that it’s (say) driver_alloc that eats all that memory and leave you with no clue which one.

While it’s often easy to tell which driver or NIF is causing problems while you’re developing, it’s not as easy when it’s used in anger alongside half a dozen others. The new “allocation tagging” feature will help you figure out where the memory went at the cost of one word per allocation. The allocations are presented as block size histograms (similar to carrier information) grouped by their origin and type:

2> instrument:allocations()
     #{udp_inet =>
           #{driver_event_state => {0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0}},
       tty_sl =>
           #{io_queue => {0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0},
             drv_internal => {0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0}},
       system =>
           #{db_segment => {0,0,0,0,0,18,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0},
             heap => {0,0,0,0,20,4,2,2,2,3,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0},
             thr_prgr_data => {38,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0},
             db_term => {271,3,1,52,80,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0},
             code => {0,0,0,5,3,6,11,22,19,20,10,2,1,0,0,0,0,0},
             binary => {18,0,0,0,7,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0},
             atom_entry => {8681,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0},
             message => {0,40,78,2,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0},
             ... }
       spawn_forker =>
           #{driver_select_data_state =>
       ram_file_drv => #{drv_binary => {0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0}},
       prim_file =>
           #{process_specific_data => {2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0},
             nif_trap_export_entry => {0,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0},
             monitor_extended => {0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0},
             drv_binary => {0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,3,5,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0},
             binary => {0,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0}},
       prim_buffer =>
           #{nif_internal => {0,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0},
             binary => {0,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0}}}}}

The above example was taken with allocation tagging turned on for all allocators (+Muatags true command line argument) to give you a better idea of what it can do. By default it will only be turned on for driver/NIF allocations and binaries since those are the most common culprits, and their allocations are generally so large that the overhead of a single word is a drop in the bucket.

(As with carriers, instrument:allocations/1 can be used to tweak the histograms and which allocators to look in.)

Further reading #

For those who’d like to know more about how our memory allocators work, Lukas Larsson’s talk at EUC 2014 is a good primer. Our internal documentation on carrier migration and inter-thread deallocation may also be of interest.

The PR implementing this change can be found here, and the documentation for the old instrumentation module can be found here.